Identification of High-Risk Intersections in an Urban Street Network Using Local and Highway Safety Manual Crash Prediction Models
https://doi.org/10.24017/science.2025.2.10
Abstract views: 0 / PDF downloads: 0Abstract
Nowadays, highway safety is a vital issue because vehicle crashes cause tremendous human, economic, social, and environment losses. This study asses intersections’ safety performance in Sulaimani urban street network where the number of vehicles has been rapidly growing, as the case study. Crash prediction models were developed and applied to assess the safety performance of the intersections. The crash data were reported from Sulaimani traffic police station, happened from January 2020 to September 2024. Besides the crash prediction models mentioned in the Highway Safety Manual (HSM), local crash prediction models for each selected intersections were developed, then the models were used as tools for assessing intersections safety performance. To know the intersections risk levels, five safety performance approaches were used namely Level of Safety Service, Excess Porengicted Average Crash Frequency using Safety Performance Function, Expected Average Crash Frequency with Empirical Bayes (EB) Adjustment, Equivalent Property Damage Only with EB Adjustment, and Excess Expected Average Crash Frequency with EB Adjustments. The results indicate that the local prediction model has a higher R² than the HSM model, indicating a better fit to the local traffic and road conditions specifically at four-leg signalized intersections, the local model achieved an R² value of 0.618, which is substantially higher than the 0.208 obtained from the HSM models. Moreoveresults show that four-leg signalized intersections have significantly higher crash rates, with 15 intersections identified as high-risk across both models. The findings offer practical insights for prioritizing safety improvements and resource allocation to enhance traffic safety in urban areas.
Keywords:
References
G. Cantisani, L. Moretti, and Y. De Andrade Barbosa, “Safety problems in urban cycling mobility: A quantitative risk analysis at urban intersections,” Safety, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 6, 2019, doi: 10.3390/safety5010006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/safety5010006
I. A. Adeniran, C. P. Efunniyi, O. S. Osundare, and A. O. Abhulimen, “Enhancing security and risk management with predictive analytics: A proactive approach,” International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 32–40, 2024, doi: 10.56781/ijsret.2024.4.1.0021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56781/ijsret.2024.4.1.0021
Federal Highway Administration, FHWA Road Safety Audit Guidelines, Appendix. Washington, DC: FHWA, 2006. [Online]. Available: https://highways.dot.gov/safety/data-analysis-tools/rsa/fhwa-road-safety-audit-guidelines/appendix
C. Chen and Y. Xie, “Modeling the effects of AADT on predicting multiple-vehicle crashes at urban and suburban signalized intersections,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 91, pp. 72–83, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.02.016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.02.016
M. Castro-Neto, Y. Jeong, M. K. Jeong, and L. D. Han, “AADT prediction using support vector regression with data-dependent parameters,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 2979–2986, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.01.073. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.01.073
National Research Council, Highway Safety Manual. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_w62.pdf
F. Guo, X. Wang, and M. Abdel-Aty, “Modeling signalized intersection safety with corridor-level spatial correlations,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 84–92, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.07.005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.07.005
S. Zhu, J. Lu, and G. Wang, “Intersection safety evaluation model,” in Traffic and Transportation Studies 2010, Reston, VA: ASCE, 2010, pp. 305–311, doi: 10.1061/41123(383)27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/41123(383)27
A. Sobhani, W. Young, D. Logan, J. Archer, and M. Sarvi, “Modelling the safety of intersections,” in Proceedings 15th International Conference of Road Safety on Four Continents, Abu Dhabi: VTI, 2010.
S. Mishra and S. Khasnabis, “Optimization model for allocating resources for highway safety improvement at urban intersections,” Journal of Transportation Engineering, vol. 138, no. 5, pp. 535–547, 2012, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000364
Y.-J. Kweon and I.-K. Lim, “Appropriate regression model types for intersections in SafetyAnalyst,” Journal of Transportation Engineering, vol. 138, no. 10, pp. 1250–1258, 2012, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000432
W. Cheng, N. Zhang, W. Li, and J. Xi, “Modeling and application of pedestrian safety conflict index at signalized intersections,” Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, vol. 2014, p. 314207, 2014, doi: 10.1155/2014/314207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/314207
P. J. Haghighatpour and R. Moayedfar, “Pedestrian crash prediction models and validation of effective factors on their safety (case study: Tehran signalized intersections),” Open Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 240–254, 2014, doi: 10.4236/ojce.2014.43021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojce.2014.43021
H. Barbosa, F. Cunto, B. Bezerra, C. Nodari, and M. A. Jacques, “Safety performance models for urban intersections in Brazil,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 70, pp. 258–266, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.04.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2014.04.008
R. Tay, “A random parameters probit model of urban and rural intersection crashes,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 84, pp. 38–40, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.07.013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.07.013
X. Xu, S. C. Wong, F. Zhu, X. Pei, H. Huang, and Y. Liu, “A Heckman selection model for the safety analysis of signalized intersections,” PLOS ONE, vol. 12, no. 7, p. e0181544, 2017, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181544. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181544
M. Essa and T. Sayed, “Traffic conflict models to evaluate the safety of signalized intersections at the cycle level,” Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, vol. 89, pp. 289–302, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2018.02.014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.02.014
Q. Cai, M. Abdel-Aty, J. Lee, L. Wang, and X. Wang, “Developing a grouped random parameters multivariate spatial model to explore zonal effects for segment and intersection crash modeling,” Analytical Methods in Accident Research, vol. 19, pp. 1–15, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.amar.2018.05.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amar.2018.05.001
X. Sun, M. A. Rahman, and M. Sun, “Safety analysis of RCUT intersection,” in Proceedings 2019 6th International Conference of Models and Technologies for Intelligent Transportation Systems (MT-ITS), 2019, pp. 1–6, doi: 10.1109/MTITS.2019.8780177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MTITS.2019.8883332
F. Wang, K. Tang, K. Li, Z. Liu, and L. Zhu, “A group-based signal timing optimization model considering safety for signalized intersections with mixed traffic flows,” Journal of Advanced Transportation, vol. 2019, p. 2747569, 2019, doi: 10.1155/2019/2747569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2747569
H.-C. Park, S. Yang, P. Y. Park, and D.-K. Kim, “Multiple membership multilevel model to estimate intersection crashes,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 144, p. 105589, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105589. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105589
T. Wang, Y.-E. Ge, Y. Wang, W. Chen, Q. Fu, and Y. Niu, “A novel model for real-time risk evaluation of vehicle–pedestrian interactions at intersections,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 206, p. 107727, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107727. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2024.107727
Downloads
How to Cite
Article Metrics
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mariwan Askander Abdulla, Hardy Kamal Karim (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.